Oct 17, 2024

Can Armenia and Azerbaijan finally reach an agreement by COP29?

As this year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference in Baku draws closer, negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan appear to be drifting further apart. Despite hopes that the opposite would be true, a lack of clarity and confusion instead continues to reign. Does the draft Agreement on Peace and Establishment of Interstate Relations contain 17 points or 16? Initially, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan had announced that consensus had been reached on 13 points while 3 were partially agreed and there was no agreement at all on a fourth. Since then, official statements and media in Armenia instead refers to 16 points though Yerevan has reportedly ditched the three incomplete articles to make only 13.

Last week, like Pashinyan at the end of August, Elchin Amirbayov, Azerbaijani Presidential Representative on Special Assignments, also used 17 for the number of points in the draft treaty. Thus, confusion stemming from a lack of coherent statements, many of which have been contradicted as soon as the following day, continues. But true, maybe this doesn’t even matter.

 

Azerbaijan has anyway made it clear that no agreement can be signed until Armenia amends its constitution, a change that seems unlikely before 2027, though some reports suggest 2026. Last year, Armenian Prime Minister stated that the Declaration of Independence underpinning the constitution would keep Yerevan in a perpetual conflict with its neighbours, specifically Ankara and Baku. Now that narrative has also shifted again. It is Azerbaijans constitution that makes territorial claims on Armenia and not vice-versa, Pashinyan recently charged.

 

[…]

 

What is known, however, is that pressure for some kind of agreement to be reached by COP29 in Baku continues. This could even be a joint statement acknowledging the progress and agreements made to date even if the Armenian opposition continues to claim that Pashinyan is ready to concede to anything to remain in power. Even so, they also claim that Aliyev is not interested in peace and that a new war will break out after the climate change conference next month. At least one pro-opposition analyst warns that Pashinyan may be testing Aliyevs patience too far though others argue Azerbaijan has no interest in signing one anyway.

 

Whether an agreement is initialled or signed by or during COP29 matters little if the alternative is war or a new and untenable status quo. Until the 44-day war in 2020, Armenia imported some of its wheat from Karabakh harvested in the seven formerly occupied regions of Azerbaijan. Now, the country is almost entirely dependent on Russian imports, as Russian MFA spokesperson Zakharova recently cautioned, raising many questions as to the haste in which Pashinyan seeks to diversify away from Moscow. The same is especially true for Russian gas. Only last month, former U.S. Ambassador to the OSCE Dan Baer caused quite a stir when he warned Armenian citizens that they should brace for cold winters ahead.

The full piece is available here

 

CONFLICT VOICES e-BOOKS

 

Conflict Voices – December 2010

Short essays on the Nagorno Karabakh Conflict
Download in English | Russian

 

Conflict Voices – May 2011

Short essays on the Nagorno Karabakh Conflict
Download in English | Russian

Armenia-Azerbaijan talks in the balance as COP29 deadline approaches

Armenia-Azerbaijan talks in the balance as COP29 deadline approaches

Many remain skeptical that such a breakthrough can materialise, though it is clear that international pressure, especially from the United States, continues unabated. It is believed that both Yerevan and Washington hope to have an agreement signed before the U.S. presidential elections on 5 November and especially by COP29 just days later.

read more