Remembering Georgi Vanyan

Remembering Georgi Vanyan

Georgi Vanyan © Meydan TV

Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso has just published my short piece remembering Armenian human rights and peace activist Georgi Vanyan who sadly passed away recently after testing positive for COVID-19 earlier this month. 

The last time I spoke to Georgi Vanyan was by telephone at the end of September. The Armenian human rights and peace activist was visiting Tbilisi […] and there were now plans to visit the Georgian village where many of his previous activities were held.

 

Georgi invited me accompany them, but there was one problem.

 

The 58-year-old was feeling ill and needed to test for COVID-19 before we could meet. Two days later, he sent a text message to say that he had tested positive and had to self-isolate in Tbilisi. He’d be in touch once he had recovered, but things took a turn for the worse and he was hospitalised. Eventually moved on to a ventilator, Georgi Vanyan was pronounced dead on 15 October.

 

The loss was a personal tragedy for those that knew him and also for a handful of committed individuals that had been working across closed borders in pursuit of regional peace.

 

“Now, at this stage of the Armenian-Azerbaijani reconciliation process, the peacebuilding community needed him more than ever,” tweeted Baku-based regional analyst and researcher Ahmad Alili. “Sincere Person. Genuine Peacebuilder. Great Loss. Rest in Peace, Georgi.”

The full article can be read here.

An immeasurable and catastrophic loss for the region – Georgi Vanyan RIP

An immeasurable and catastrophic loss for the region – Georgi Vanyan RIP

Georgi Vanyan, Tekali, Georgia © Onnik James Krikorian 2012

It is with great sadness that I write this post. Georgi Vanyan, human rights and peace activist, has died. Upon hearing that he had been moved on to a ventilator after being diagnosed and hospitalised in Tbilisi with COVID-19 I think we knew that this was how it was going to end, but that doesn’t make the loss any less painful. Following last year’s war, Georgi was needed now more than ever.

Arguably the most genuine peace builder in the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, Georgi was admittedly a controversial figure at home. In 2007 he held a Days of Azerbaijan cultural event at an experimental Yerevan school that was interrupted by nationalist bloggers and many who received grants for peacebuilding, perhaps feeling threatened by someone more genuine than they were, cynically attempted to ostracise him as well. Armenian mass media also launched a coordinated campaign to discredit his work.

In 2009, therefore, I had to meet him. I also had to interview him.

[…] Vanyan argues […]  there needs to be new approaches taken to prepare society for peace. Indeed, he says, the desire to end the conflict needs to be there in the first place.  “Armenians and Azerbaijanis are human beings first of all and have a basic desire for peace. What we need to do is to make this basic desire public and to initiate some kind of open public discussion. Instead of organizing seminars and talking to NGOs, we talk to people in the markets, or in local cultural centers.”

Perhaps Georgi’s greatest legacy will be his Tekali Process, the regular gathering of activists, academics, and residents of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia in the small ethnic Azerbaijani village of Tekali located close to where the borders of all three countries intersect. I traveled with Georgi at the end of January 2011 to review the potential location for the first meeting held in March the same year. 

The roads have seen better days and probably so too have the villagers, but if events continue to be held in a small ethnic Azeri village in Georgia that might all change. Situated just 10 kilometers from the Georgian border with Azerbaijan, and 29 kilometers from the crossing with Armenia, those attempting to establish Tekali as a regional peacebuilding center certainly hope so. One of them, Armenian theatrical director turned activist Georgi Vanyan has already called on other NGOs to relocate some of their existing and future regional and cross-border projects there. If that were to happen, much needed investment could be attracted to Tekali as well as the surrounding area and involve wider society in dialogue, discussion and debate.

Sadly, I could not rejoin Georgi for another visit to Tekali at the beginning of this month, over 10 years later. He had rung me up saying that he might have COVID-19 and so didn’t want to put me in harms way. Once his situation was clear, he said, he will take me there again. Two days later, this was our last communication via FB messenger.

Georgi, you are already missed.

With Armenia and Azerbaijan seemingly close to normalising relations after three decades of animosity there are many of us so sorry that you are now no longer here to see it. You will always be in our memories, however, and despite the efforts of all those who ganged up against you, we will make sure that you are never forgotten.

Georgi, you are a tremendous inspiration and will forever remain so.

Rest in Peace.

Revisiting the Tekali Process: Georgi Vanyan in Tbilisi

Revisiting the Tekali Process: Georgi Vanyan in Tbilisi

An ethnic Azerbaijani child in Tekali, Georgia © Onnik James Krikorian 2011

It was a pleasant surprise to receive a phone call from perhaps Armenia’s main peacebuilder, theatrical director turned activist Georgi Vanyan. All going well we’ll meet up again in a few days. I had first interviewed him in 2009 and he isn’t just one of the main advocates for peace and regional integration, but one of the few genuine ones. His approach has always been refreshing.

“Many individuals involved in these peace-making initiatives don’t have any interest in seeing the conflict resolved because they have a certain ‘visibility’ and also financially gain from the situation,” he explains. “Churchill said that in order for corruption to flourish there is the need for an external aggressor. Everything is calculated, including the nationalist rhetoric injected into society. The mass media is part of this too. “ 

 

[…]

 

Instead, Vanyan argues, there needs to be new approaches taken to prepare society for peace. Indeed, he says, the desire to end the conflict needs to be there in the first place.  “Armenians and Azerbaijanis are human beings first of all and have a basic desire for peace. What we need to do is to make this basic desire public and to initiate some kind of open public discussion. Instead of organizing seminars and talking to NGOs, we talk to people in the markets, or in local cultural centers.”

Tekali, Georgia © Onnik James Krikorian 2011

In addition to holding the Days of Azerbaijan at the Mkhitar Sebastatsi Educational Complex in Yerevan, Vanyan is perhaps best known for his Tekali process, a series of regional meetings held in the ethnic Azerbaijani village of the same name in Georgia close to both the Armenian and Azerbaijani borders.

In 2011, I also wrote my first article about it.

What makes Vanyan different, perhaps, is that rather than be content with holding his activities at holiday resorts or five star hotels on neutral ground in third countries such as Georgia, Vanyan targets the general population. “The approach of keeping everything closed carries with it some very grave consequences,” he explains. “Armenians and Azerbaijanis are human beings first of all and have a basic desire for peace. What we need to do is to make this basic desire public and to initiate some kind of open discussion. Instead of organizing seminars, we talk to people in the markets, or in local cultural centers. It’s why we hope events such as our film festival will start some kind of discussion in society.”

 

[…]

 

“The establishment of a peacemaking center in Tekalo will be the first step for the creation of a free communication zone for citizens of the three countries,” a press release declared. “This proposal is based on our firm belief that Armenian-Azeri dialogue may take place only under the conditions of the revival of the South Caucasus region, of regional thinking, and regional integration and safety. Georgia is a part of this region, its central player,” it continued, while also calling for other civil society organizations to relocate their cross-border activities there. As part of the project, the local infrastructure including schools, cultural centers and roads, for example, would be renovated.

 

[…] 

 

With the involvement of participants from Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, it will likely result in more criticism for Vanyan, and especially inside Armenia, but he remains undaunted. “Communication is not betrayal,” he told an Azerbaijan newspaper in 2009. “It is a natural human need.”

And communication did indeed happen. Moreover, rather than just be confined to largely English-speaking elites in the capitals of Armenia and Azerbaijan, Tekali allowed for people from the regions of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia to attend.  And by not holding the events in a fancy resort hotel, they not only cost less than most other peacebuilding events, but they also benefitted local communities. Ethnic Azerbaijani residents of Tekali, for example, prepared the food for participants.

Ethnic Azerbaijani residents of Tekali, Georgia © Onnik James Krikorian 2012

 Following last year’s war, the importance of projects such as Tekali are glaringly obvious as focus inevitably shifts from those elites in Yerevan and Baku to communities in close proximity with each other. There are also sustainable development and community empowerment elements too. Revisiting my second article written about Tekali it will be good to hopefully return there with Vanyan in a few days.

The roads have seen better days and probably so too have the villagers, but if events continue to be held in a small ethnic Azeri village in Georgia that might all change. Situated just 10 kilometers from the Georgian border with Azerbaijan, and 29 kilometers from the crossing with Armenia, those attempting to establish Tekali as a regional peacebuilding center certainly hope so. One of them, Armenian theatrical director turned activist Georgi Vanyan has already called on other NGOs to relocate some of their existing and future regional and cross-border projects there. If that were to happen, much needed investment could be attracted to Tekali as well as the surrounding area and involve wider society in dialogue, discussion and debate.

 

[…]

 

What happens next in Tekali remains to be seen, but Vanyan hopes to establish a print and online newspaper dealing with the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict in Armenian, Azerbaijani, Russian and English. A radio station based in the village, which will broadcast to audiences in the regions of all three countries, is also planned along with a cinema, library and Internet café. Cultural activities would also be included. One idea, for example, is to stage a localized version of Romeo and Juliet with an Armenian and Azerbaijani playing the lead roles. Even if unrelated to Tekali, others such as Azerbaijani film director Rustam Ibragimbekov are already hoping to secure funding to film the famous fictional love story in the context of Armenia and Azerbaijan.

 

“I want to show the tragedy of two lovers whose lives were tragically changed by the conflict,” Ibragimbekov told EurasiaNet in early March. “When shooting stops, people-to-people contacts get back onto a peaceful path, as they understand that the conflicts are started by governments and radical groups, not by ordinary people.”

Tekali, Georgia © Onnik James Krikorian 2012

Will try to write an update on his future plans in the nearest future. Until then, you can follow Georgi Vanyan on Facebook here.

Ethnic Azerbaijani kids in Tekali, Georgia © Onnik James Krikorian 2011-12

Before Zoom there was… Skype

Before Zoom there was… Skype

© Cartoon Stock

Love it or hate it, Zoom has become an integral part of many people’s lives during this pandemic and naturally, given even more closed borders because of the epidemiological situation, conflict-resolution projects. While this is to be applauded given that it has opened up communication in the public sphere, those organisations engaged in Armenia-Azerbaijan peacebuilding continually fail to use new tools adequately. Indeed, it has been an abject failure, continues to be one, and there is little sign that they have learned from their past mistakes too. 

It’s too easy to blame those failings on the technology not existing until now as it has existed for well over a decade. In the late 2000s, for example, pioneering the use of blogs and social media to connect Armenians and Azerbaijanis online, I presented on this extensively from Yerevan and Dublin to Washington D.C. and Vienna, and as the then Global Voices Caucasus Regional Editor even used Skype to record interviews across borders. One of the first, for example, was with blogger Scary Azeri who I recorded through Skype from Yerevan in 2009.

Unashamedly acerbic, but alway humorous, the blog has fast become popular with many interested in the region and posts have even been republished by the media in her native Azerbaijan. Today, Global Voices Online interviewed Scary Azeri about blogging, tweeting, cultural clashes, trolls and more.

Of course, nothing beats offline meetings and Nailya (Scary Azeri) and I met first in London the following year. Ironically, because of the pandemic and her wanting to meet her mother who flew in from Baku while she traveled from Doha, Nailya and I met again earlier this year in Tbilisi. 

Credit where it’s due, there was at least one organisation that thought out of the box. In 2009, DOTCOM, a US State Department-funded project implemented by PH International, connected teenagers from Armenia and Azerbaijan online and off. Unlike other conflict resolution projects at the time, Project Director Elizabeth Métraux was refreshingly open and honest about the project in my interview also held in 2009.

With the ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the disputed territory of Nagorno Karabakh understandably creating some problems, especially when ten teenagers from each of the two countries met up with their American counterparts in the U.S. last month, Program Director Elizabeth Métraux speaks candidly about some of the challenges experienced so far as well as some of the program’s successes.

Writing this blog post I’m reminded of an event held in Yerevan in 2010, the following year. Attending a regional conference with the British Ambassador, he told me that it was impossible to arrange for a few Azerbaijani analysts and activists to travel to Armenia to present. We were standing in the conference room of a large hotel with fast Internet and a projection screen. “They could have used Skype,” I responded, checking the connection speed from my phone. “It’s fast enough for video.”

Sadly, I remain unconvinced that those engaged in this sphere have examined so many other lost opportunities for connection in absentia or how to communicate in ways that larger society can understand.

As I’ve said before, it’s almost as if conflict resolution organisations are now up to the level of the late 2000s in their use of new technology and platforms while the rest of the world, and the societies they are failing to reach, are quite clearly in 2021. And it’s not as if they haven’t been told. In 2010 when peacebuilding organisations followed my lead in using blogs and social media to connect Armenians and Azerbaijanis online, they totally ignored my warnings about trolls and others seeking to derail the process, something that monopolised online discussion during and after last year’s war.

And that wasn’t the only time. About 5 or 6 years ago, I also advised the donors of a very large Karabakh project that social media needs to be taken seriously by those engaged in Armenia-Azerbaijan peacebuilding in the region. They agreed and I drew up a set of recommendations that could have served as the basis for effective outreach online, but the actual project lead on it responded defensively and somewhat aggressively instead. “Social Media is not rocket science,” I was told.

Well, I’m sorry to say, if you couldn’t and still can’t recognise the need to produce custom content for multiple online platforms as well as bring in others such as marketing professionals and behavioural scientists then it might just as well be. Social media is not simply opening a Facebook, Youtube, and Twitter account. It’s about engagement and, as they say, about content being king, especially in a world of memes and low attention spans.

 

Jam! Events #COVID19 Keep A-Live & Stream in Tbilisi

Jam! Events #COVID19 Keep A-Live & Stream in Tbilisi

Psychonaut 4, Jam! Events Keep A-Live & Stream, Tbilisi, Georgia
© Onnik James Krikorian 2021

Another year has been and gone in the COVID-19 pandemic. Though 2020 was largely defined by the absence of any live gigs in Tbilisi I was at least fortunate enough to be able to attend band rehearsals and in September that year a special live-streamed event by Jam! Events in cooperation with the city municipality. This September, a repeat event was held and I was also fortunate to again be part of a physical audience made up of band members, technicians, and a few friends.

Both events were the brainchild of local rock and metal promoter Eric Hutchence, the man behind Jam! Events and also what was the yearly Wacken Metal Battle-Caucasus, a competition that gave an opportunity to metal bands from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia to face-off against each other for a coveted place in the Wacken metal music festival held annually in Germany.  Sadly, because of the pandemic, new formats for the competition might have to be explored for this to continue.

Anyway, it was good to meet old friends from my time filming Tbilisi Underground, a personal project to present the underground punk and metal scene in the Georgian capital to both a domestic and foreign audience. Unfortunately, when international media does visit Georgia it instead fixates on the electronic music scene despite there being way more to local music than just that and even though bands like Psychonaut 4 have found success well outside of the country’s borders.

The punk scene is especially interesting because most of the bands perform in Georgian and thus can be understood by more of the population. The same is true for the hip-hop scene, something that is considered to be especially vibrant in Georgia, and even Psychonaut 4’s last album was in Georgian as well. This makes tracks like this one below all the more important in conveying a message against drug abuse, for example.

So thanks to Eric and Jam! Events as usual and I hope that we’ll eventually see live gigs and festivals with a physical audience return soon enough, pandemic permitting. Until then, below are galleries of some of the bands that performed last Sunday in Tbilisi.

Rock on. 🤘😷

Lady Heroine, Jam! Events Keep A-Live & Stream, Tbilisi, Georgia
© Onnik James Krikorian 2021

Letter, Jam! Events Keep A-Live & Stream, Tbilisi, Georgia
© Onnik James Krikorian 2021

Dismorial, Jam! Events Keep A-Live & Stream, Tbilisi, Georgia
© Onnik James Krikorian 2021

Psychonaut 4, Jam! Events Keep A-Live & Stream, Tbilisi, Georgia
© Onnik James Krikorian 2021