Jan 10, 2015

Three Cartoons by Muslims that take on Radicalisation and Violent Extremism

Suleiman Bakhit © Onnik James Krikorian 2014

The 7 January attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo, a controversial Paris satirical publication that has always had its detractors, including at times the French and U.S. governments, was both shocking and callous. Twelve people were initially killed in the carnage perpetrated by Islamic extremists while an increasingly polarised discourse in its aftermath runs the risk of provoking more as latent, inherent Islamophobia surfaces in Europe.

Muslims are ‘expected to apologise’ for the act committed by a few even though many did, and despite finding themselves the main victims of extremism more often than not. A much bloodier attack in Yemen the same day as well as even more alarming news from Nigeria highlighted that all too well. December’s callous attack by the Taliban in Pakistan which killed 145 — 132 of which were children — was especially horrific.

But it is the terrible tragedy in Paris that has grabbed more media attention, probably because it occured in the heart of Europe and because most of the victims were journalists. Without a doubt, the terrorist attack is inexcusable, but while Charlie Hebdo’s cartoons were unlikely to have won many fans before the massacre, media and individuals alike are now expected to embrace their work without question. 

That’s not to say that the attack wasn’t cowardly or abhorrent. It was, but in what is fast becoming a single narrative embodying Charlie Hebdo as a bulwark against violent extremism, others doing more immediate work are being ignored. Moreover, what’s important and significant about these people is that they are Moslem. Arguably, their work is just as important, if not more so, and deserves acknowledgement and support.

There’s Abdullah-X, for example, a former radical who now uses animated cartoons posted online to prevent radicalisation among marginalised Muslim youth in the United Kingdom. Run on a shoestring budget, it gets some coverage, but not nearly enough at a time when Islam, radicalisation, and cartoons are firmly in the media spotlight.

In the cartoons, Abdullah-X is a disillusioned young British Muslim who explores the reasons behind British Muslims’ decisions to get involved in extremist activities abroad, but eventually decides that extremism is not the path for him.

 

In one video Abdullah asks, “You have to kill others to make your world purer. This is what you think Islam is? Are you for real?”, while another post questions those who justify “their own hate through Islam.”

 

In his first interview, the creator, who prefers to remain anonymous, told Sky News that he hoped the cartoons would dissuade young Muslims from getting involved in foreign jihads, as well as dispelling some of the “myths” and “prejudices” non-Muslims may have about Islam.

There’s also Suleiman Bakhit who’s doing some amazing work by providing Muslim kids with alternative role models in the hope that they too can be steered away from the path to radicalisation.

He decided to visit schools in the area to build community relations and explain to American children that most Muslims are not terrorists. When he was asked by a young boy if the Arab world had its own Superman and Batman, he realized the answer was no. He describes the moment as an epiphany. He taught himself how to draw and began creating stories and characters. Eventually, he moved back to Jordan and started his company.

 

Early on, he conducted focus groups with Jordanian children from different economic classes.

 

“I went there and asked the kids, ‘Who are your heroes?’ ” he said. “ ‘We don’t have any heroes, but we hear a lot about Bin Laden, about Zarqawi,’ ” he said they told him, referring to the Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who led the group that evolved into the Islamic State. “I’m like, ‘What do you hear about them?’ The children replied, ‘That they defend us against the West because the West is out there to kill us.’ And this is the terrorist narrative and Propaganda 101.”

And they’re not the only ones. There’s also Burka Avenger, a cartoon from Pakistan that’s incredibly relevant given the Taliban shooting of Malala Yousafzai. It’s also educational and strong on moral values enough that it should also probably be aired for children in non-Muslim countries. It has received media coverage, of course, but sometimes more because the heroine wears a burka to fight extremists rather than its message.

There was no mention of freedom of expression on that issue, even though the heroine spends most of her time not wearing it, and despite the same argument being frequently used to justify the depiction of Muslim and other faiths by Charlie Hebdo.

True, none of these examples can be described as satire, but then again, Charlie Hebdo was no “Four Lions’ either. That still relevant and informed take on locally grown foreign fighters by Chris Morris wasn’t afraid to target the establishment as well as jihadists, something Charlie Hebdo arguably did no longer. Moreover, these three individuals represent something that is more necessary than ever, especially after the Paris shootings.

Rather than ridicule fanaticism, they seek to counter and prevent radicalisation in order to prevent terrorist incidents in the future, something I witnessed firsthand in December at the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Expo organised by the Hedayah Centre and Global Counterterrorism Forum (GCTF) in Abu Dhabi. Bakhit was there, as were the creators of Abdullah-X and Burka Avenger.

It also meant I got to sit in on quite a few private conversations between the man behind Abdullah-X, Ashraf al-Khaled — a man who humbled me with his vision of peace and coexistence despite Al Qaeda suicide bombing his wedding) — and Michael Haines, brother of aid worker David who was beheaded by the Islamic State in September. And it is that discourse that is sorely needed in the open today after Charlie Hebdo.

Not Islamophobia.

The attack on Charlie Hebdo was vile and disgusting and everyone is justified in their outrage. But before the far-right in Europe hijack the tragedy for their own political agenda, perhaps its time to also support and show solidarity with those using cartoons and other mediums to counter the narratives of extremists of all persuasions while avoiding falling into the trap of categorising all Moslems as somehow responsible for the attack.

Militant Groups Resurface in Armenia’s Struggle Against Radicalization

Militant Groups Resurface in Armenia’s Struggle Against Radicalization

Last month, Armenia arrested several individuals accused of recruiting others to stage a coup in the country. The group has a history of recruiting Armenian citizens as foreign fighters in Russia’s war in Ukraine.

The Armenian government faces a potential vulnerability from militant groups as progress occurs in the normalization process with Azerbaijan following the 2020 44-day war and recent conflict in Karabakh, fueling discontent among many Armenians.

read more
Assault on Yerevan Police Station Underlines Risk of Violent Opposition to Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace

Assault on Yerevan Police Station Underlines Risk of Violent Opposition to Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace

For many, the news of the assault on a police station in Yerevan over the weekend brought back memories of the two-week siege of another station back in 2016. The reasons were similar too. Eight years ago, just a few months after the four-day war, rumours spread throughout Armenia that then President Serzh Sargsyan was under pressure to accept the so-called Lavrov Plan in which five out of seven regions then occupied by Armenian forces would be handed back to Azerbaijan as part of an anticipated peace deal.

read more